Google serves a lot of useful web application, but I did not use any of them until last month.
Ma first impression of iGoogle was 'what shoul I do with this add-on application.'
However, ma thought was 100 percent incorrect, the iGoogle is not an add-on web application, but a OS free something. (I cannot fully express it with appropriate word.)
If ma PC can be hooked on the internet and I can use some kind of browser, then whatever I want to do with the MS office will be solved.
When first I read the news about the competition between MS and Google, I cannnot understand the situation in the web wars, but now I use the Google note as a main notepad, without MS words. (It is innovational exchange in ma life.)
If I wanna write a short memo, I do not want to start the MS words and to wait the loading release, but with Google note, if I have dual monitor screen, the note will be there every time.
Moreover, if I use the Google note, whenver I want to approach to ma prior memo without ma office PC, it can be.
The ubiquitous is not the marketing cath-phrase with the iGoogle.
How do you think about it?
Am I right?
댓글 1개:
Hey!
I came across your blog when I clicked to see who else in the blogger blogosphere listed umberto eco's "the name of the rose" as a favorite book. Just thought I'd leave a hello. That's all.
- S
댓글 쓰기